• The Michigan Supreme Court rejected an appeal to disqualify former President Donald Trump from the state's 2024 presidential primary ballot.
• State courts across the U.S. are facing cases to remove Trump from their ballots based on a constitutional clause that prevents those who engage in insurrection activity from holding office.
• Colorado is the only state so far that has ruled in favor of such a case, barring Trump from its ballot, though its decision will not take effect until at least Jan. 4.

The Michigan Supreme Court on Wednesday rejected an attempt to remove former President Donald Trump from the state's 2024 presidential primary ballot.

The Michigan court ruled against an appeal by liberal group Free Speech For People to block Trump from running for his involvement in inciting the Jan. 6, 2021, storming of the U.S. Capitol.

Michigan, a key election battleground, has helped decide the past two presidential elections, going for Trump in 2016 and President Joe Biden in 2020.

State courts across the U.S. are confronting similar cases trying to remove Trump from the 2024 ballot on the basis of Section 3 of the 14th Amendment, a constitutional clause that bans those who engage in insurrection activity from holding office.

The decision by the Michigan high court came more than a week after the Colorado Supreme Court disqualified Trump from that state's primary ballot. Colorado is the only state so far that has ruled in favor of barring Trump from its 2024 ballot.

That ruling did not sway the Michigan court, which noted in its opinion that "Colorado's election laws differ from Michigan's laws in a material way."

Furthermore, the Colorado Supreme Court delayed the ruling from taking effect until Jan. 4, giving Trump time to appeal the decision to the U.S. Supreme Court, which his campaign has pledged to do. The U.S. high court has never ruled on Section 3's meaning.

Free Speech For People had also tried to get Trump off the ballot in Minnesota whose Supreme Court, like that of Michigan, rejected the case.

The Michigan court's ruling Wednesday reinforces an earlier decision from a judge in the state's Court of Claims, which said that election officials cannot dictate a presidential primary candidate's eligibility.

It also said that Trump had not violated the state's election laws when he filed to run in the primary.

Don't miss these stories from CNBC PRO:

• Official Wall Street outlook: Here's where strategists see the stock market going in 2024
• Here's where to invest $50,000 heading into 2024, according to market pros
• Morgan Stanley prefers 'boring' non-AI tech stocks for 2024. Here are its top global picks
• Bank of America reveals its 4 top biotech picks for 2024 — and gives one 166% upside
• CD rates are dropping. Here's where to find the highest payouts